Celebrity lives are always under the microscope, and their personal decisions often become topics of public discussion. The recent buzz is about Samantha Ruth Prabhu, who was spotted without her “Ye Maaya Chesave” tattoo—a tribute to the film where her love story with Naga Chaitanya began.

This move comes four years after the couple’s divorce, and a video of Samantha without the tattoo has gone viral, stirring conversations online. While many see it as a powerful act of closure, others are debating whether removing a tattoo linked to one's past love is necessary or even fair.

Tattoos are deeply personal. For some, they are a timeline of memories—good or bad. For others, they are symbols that lose meaning with time. Samantha’s choice brings up a question many might relate to:

When love fades, should the ink fade too?

Let’s not forget that moving on looks different for everyone. But does altering the body to erase emotional history help the healing process, or does it fuel public curiosity even more?

🗳️ Vote and see where others stand!

💬 What Do You Think?

This isn’t just about a celebrity — it’s about how we all handle past relationships, symbols of love, and moving on.

📣 Share your thoughts in the comments:

• Would you remove a tattoo that reminded you of your ex?

• Do public figures owe sentiment to fans over personal choices?